当前位置: 首页 行业资讯 水业新闻 正文湿法烟气脱硫废水处置工程实例 作者:倪亭亭1， 王云钟1， 吴永明2， 胡玲玲3， 杨春燕2， 邓觅2（1.青岛海检节能环保有限公司，山东 青岛 266235；2.江西省科学院，江西 南昌 3300发布日期：2023-09-28来历：湿法烟气脱硫废水处置工程实例 作者:倪亭亭1， 王云钟1，阅读次数：90焦点提醒：English上一篇下一篇PDF下载[1]倪亭亭,王云钟,吴永明,等.湿法烟气脱硫废水处置工程实例[J].中国给水排水,2022,38(4):109-113. NITing-ting,WANGYun-zhong,WUYong-ming,et al.Case of Wet Flue Gas Desulfurization Wastewater Treatment Project[J湿法烟气脱硫废水处置工程实例作者:倪亭亭1， 王云钟1， 吴永明2， 胡玲玲3， 杨春燕2， 邓觅2（1.青岛海检节能环保有限公司，山东 青岛 266235；2.江西省科学院，江西 南昌 330096；3.江西省水文监测中间，江西 南昌 330000）PDF下载[1]倪亭亭,王云钟,吴永明,等.湿法烟气脱硫废水处置工程实例[J].中国给水排水,2022,38(4):109-113. NITing-ting,WANGYun-zhong,WUYong-ming,et al.Case of Wet Flue Gas Desulfurization Wastewater Treatment Project[J].China Water Wastewater,2022,38(4):109-113.点击复制湿法烟气脱硫废水处置工程实例中国给水排水[ISSN:1000-4062/CN:12-1073/TU] 卷: 第38卷 期数: 2022年第4期 页码: 109-113 栏目: 出书日期: 2022-02-17Title:Case of Wet Flue Gas Desulfurization Wastewater Treatment Project作者:倪亭亭1， 王云钟1， 吴永明2， 胡玲玲3， 杨春燕2， 邓觅2（1.青岛海检节能环保有限公司，山东 青岛 266235；2.江西省科学院，江西 南昌 330096；3.江西省水文监测中间，江西 南昌 330000）Author(s):NI Ting-ting1， WANG Yun-zhong1， WU Yong-ming2， HU Ling-ling3， YANG Chun-yan2， DENG Mi2（1. Qingdao Haijian Energy Conservation and Environmental Protection Co. Ltd.， Qingdao 266235， China； 2. Jiangxi Academy of Sciences， Nanchang 330096， China； 3. Jiangxi Water Resources Monitoring Center， Nanchang 330000， China）要害词:脱硫废水; 湿式石灰石-石膏法; 化学沉淀法; 混凝沉淀Keywords:desulfurization wastewater; wet limestone-gypsum; chemical precipitation method; coagulation sedimentation摘要:针对某热电厂石灰石-石膏法烟气脱硫工艺废渣处置系统发生的脱硫废水，采取化学沉淀工艺进行处置，颠末一年的运行发现其手艺靠得住、不变，对悬浮物、COD、氟化物、汞、硫酸盐的去除率别离到达99.5%、98.3%、87.5%、99.8%、85.6%，对应出水浓度别离为54、20、9.6、0.04、980 mg/L，出水水质知足并优在《火电厂石灰石-石膏湿法脱硫废水水质节制指标》（DL/T 997 2006）的要求，且电费和药剂费合计仅为6.65 元/m3。Abstract:The desulfurization wastewater generated by the waste residue treatment system of the limestone-gypsum flue gas desulfurization (FGD) process in a thermal power plant is treated by chemical precipitation process. After one year of operation, the technology is found reliable and stable. The removal rates of SS, COD, fluoride, mercury and sulfate reached 99.5%, 98.3%, 87.5%, 99.8% and 85.6% respectively, and the corresponding effluent concentrations were 54 mg/L, 20 mg/L and 9.6 mg/L, 0.04 mg/L, 980 mg/L. Finally, the effluent quality of the system is no less than the requirements of Discharge Standard of Wastewater from Limestone?gypsum Flue Gas Desulfurization System in Fossil Fuel Power Plants (DL/T 997-2006). In addition, the total cost of electricity and chemical is only 6.65 yuan/m3.类似文献/References:[1]周明飞,连坤宙,王璟,等.电渗析手艺处置脱硫废水的结果阐发[J].中国给水排水,2020,36(21):80. ZHOU Ming-fei,LIAN Kun-zhou,WANG Jing,et al.Efficiency Analysis of Desulfurization Wastewater Treated by Electrodialysis Technology[J].China Water Wastewater,2020,36(4):80.更新日期/Last Update: 2022-02-17[1]倪亭亭,王云钟,吴永明,等.湿法烟气脱硫废水处置工程实例[J].中国给水排水,2022,38(4):109-113. NITing-ting,WANGYun-zhong,WUYong-ming,et al.Case of Wet Flue Gas Desulfurization Wastewater Treatment Project[J].China Water Wastewater,2022,38(4):109-113.点击复制湿法烟气脱硫废水处置工程实例中国给水排水[ISSN:1000-4062/CN:12-1073/TU]卷:第38卷期数:2022年第4期页码:109-113栏目:出书日期:2022-02-17Title:Case of Wet Flue Gas Desulfurization Wastewater Treatment Project作者:倪亭亭1， 王云钟1， 吴永明2， 胡玲玲3， 杨春燕2， 邓觅2（1.青岛海检节能环保有限公司，山东 青岛 266235；2.江西省科学院，江西 南昌 330096；3.江西省水文监测中间，江西 南昌 330000）Author(s):NI Ting-ting1， WANG Yun-zhong1， WU Yong-ming2， HU Ling-ling3， YANG Chun-yan2， DENG Mi2（1. Qingdao Haijian Energy Conservation and Environmental Protection Co. Ltd.， Qingdao 266235， China； 2. Jiangxi Academy of Sciences， Nanchang 330096， China； 3. Jiangxi Water Resources Monitoring Center， Nanchang 330000， China）要害词:����ȫվAPP脱硫废水;湿式石灰石-石膏法;化学沉淀法;混凝沉淀Keywords:desulfurization wastewater;wet limestone-gypsum;chemical precipitation method;coagulation sedimentation摘要:针对某热电厂石灰石-石膏法烟气脱硫工艺废渣处置系统发生的脱硫废水，采取化学沉淀工艺进行处置，颠末一年的运行发现其手艺靠得住、不变，对悬浮物、COD、氟化物、汞、硫酸盐的去除率别离到达99.5%、98.3%、87.5%、99.8%、85.6%，对应出水浓度别离为54、20、9.6、0.04、980 mg/L，出水水质知足并优在《火电厂石灰石-石膏湿法脱硫废水水质节制指标》（DL/T 997 2006）的要求，且电费和药剂费合计仅为6.65 元/m3。Abstract:The desulfurization wastewater generated by the waste residue treatment system of the limestone-gypsum flue gas desulfurization (FGD) process in a thermal power plant is treated by chemical precipitation process. After one year of operation, the technology is found reliable and stable. The removal rates of SS, COD, fluoride, mercury and sulfate reached 99.5%, 98.3%, 87.5%, 99.8% and 85.6% respectively, and the corresponding effluent concentrations were 54 mg/L, 20 mg/L and 9.6 mg/L, 0.04 mg/L, 980 mg/L. Finally, the effluent quality of the system is no less than the requirements of Discharge Standard of Wastewater from Limestone?gypsum Flue Gas Desulfurization System in Fossil Fuel Power Plants (DL/T 997-2006). In addition, the total cost of electricity and chemical is only 6.65 yuan/m3.类似文献/References:

[1]周明飞,连坤宙,王璟,等.电渗析手艺处置脱硫废水的结果阐发[J].中国给水排水,2020,36(21):80.ZHOU Ming-fei,LIAN Kun-zhou,WANG Jing,et al.Efficiency Analysis of Desulfurization Wastewater Treated by Electrodialysis Technology[J].China Water Wastewater,2020,36(4):80.